Hiring Bambi When You Need A Monster

Thanks to TIME for releasing this list of their Top 25 Horror Movies yesterday.
One entry they included on this list clearly illustrates the absurdity that can some times override our better judgment.
Surprisingly, they listed Bambi (1942) as one of the “Top 25 Horror Movies of All Time” because the film has a “primal shock that still haunts oldsters who saw it 40, 50, 65 years ago.”
Seriously? Seriously. That’s interesting because I’ve never heard about anyone walking into a Blockbuster Video store on Halloween night looking for Bambi.
Given the many parallels, this got me thinking about recruiting.
For the purposes of this discussion, let’s pretend that the author who compiled this list was a Hiring Manager. Their primary function this month was to find the scariest candidates (i.e. movies) and ultimately choose the Top 25 before selecting only one.
There was no shortage of candidates because they were able to seek candidates from a number of quality sources (i.e. they had the entire history of film - foreign and domestic - to choose from!) so the only challenge for them was to narrow the group of qualified candidates down to a select few who best matched the job profile.
What’s the job profile? The job profile should have been simple enough to create and understand. Forget about basic responsibilities and qualifications, this Hiring Manager did things right and went far beyond the traditional job description to outline behaviors and performance metrics.
In other words, we’d assume that this Hiring Manager took the lead in identifying not just what the candidate will do (i.e. scare people on a regular basis, time-after-time, year-after-year and regardless of the occasion), but also the specific characteristics a candidate must possess to be successful (i.e. candidates needed to be pure evil; a true villain who created conflict and tension from the opening scene to the last).
So, how in the world did this Hiring Manager end up hiring Bambi when they clearly needed a Monster instead?
The most likely scenario is that a number of factors were at play here. Specifically, I’d guess that 2 of the most common hiring mistakes could be found here in this case…
(a) Relying solely on interviews to evaluate a candidate. I’m sure Bambi was very pleasant and personable in his interview. In fact, he was probably a breath of fresh air to the Hiring Manager given the freaks that he/she was accustomed to meeting for this position. However, the goal isn’t about selecting the candidate who merely presents themselves well and/or better than the rest. It’s about finding the right match for the job.
(b) Evaluating personality instead of job skills. While assessing personality/behavior is an important part of the process we need to remember that it’s only one part of the process and it should never be the most important criteria in a search for Peak Performers. Again, I’m positive that Bambi would’ve aced this portion of the process with flying colors.
There could’ve been a few more factors involved, but I think these are the two most likely to have impacted the Hiring Manager’s decision.
The result? The Hiring Manager not only hired a candidate for the wrong reasons, but they overlooked several Peak Performers (better candidates for the job) who were right in front of them!
Next year, when this Hiring Manager is tasked with the same assignment he/she would be wise to simply ask 3 very important questions…
1. Can the candidate do the job? In this case, the candidate should be able to scare people on a consistent basis from the opening scene straight through to the closing credits (regardless of the viewer’s age; regardless of the time of year). Is the Monster motivated to scare people?
2. Will the candidate do the job? In this case, a clear understanding of the candidate’s motivating factors, personality/behavioral profile and on-the-job characterisitics/traits is essential to being able to answer this question. Does the Monster enjoy their job and enjoy creating mass horror on a regular basis?
3. How will the candidate do the job? In this case, how has the Monster handled a similar assignment in the past? Have they proven that they can do what will be asked of them and do it at a high and consistent level?
Sadly, our friend Bambi falls short in all 3 areas.
Bambi may be able to scare some people, but not everyone. He’s a cute cartoon character, not a realistic looking villain bent on fear and destruction so I would have to question his makeup and whether or not he “has it in him” to even scare people at all let alone on a regular basis.
Plus, as far as past performance is concerned, Bambi wasn’t the one who actually created the horror, but instead was only a part of the process. You could say that Bambi has shown that he is capable of doing this job to an extent, but only if part of a larger team/group.
The moral of the story?
Any hiring decision you make is a critical one. Making the wrong decision when you have all the proof you need to make the right one is pure foolishness.
Don’t choose to ingore the truth. Don’t hire Bambi when you need a Monster or else you run the risk of setting your company back even further.
Now that’s scary!